Jury says Tesla was suspected of a fatal accident

The Florida Jury on Friday found that the sunset errors to blame the 22-year-old woman, and severely damaged her boyfriend. The decision is an important pressure of carmaker, who is stabbed to the future in developing the driving taxes.
The judge’s decision, if we support a complaint, may require the Tessela pay for $ 243 million in puntitive and compensate for the damage to the parents of the woman and his circumcision.
The judge found that Tesla carried 33 percent of the attributes of the accident, and he blamed the driver, George Brian McGee, which was left. Mr McGee once lived with the family for the sum that was not exposed.
Tesla said it would attract.
“Today’s decision is wrong and applies only to set up the TESLA safety and the efforts of the industry to promote and use the company.
The Jury Damage prizes are usually reduced by high courts. In the same condition, when Tessa driver died there was TRUQur, the Florida filed a complaint in court that the court could not afford the injury. The accusers failed to prove that Tesla “knew or knew” that their technology was “likely to cause death or serious injury to the body,” said the court in February.
This decision comes just a few weeks after Tesla begins a limited test for independent Austin, Texas. Elon Musk, the Chief Executive Officer, said at the investor’s summit in July The ministry can compare part of the population of the United States by the end of the year.
Mr Musk, a very confident history that the productivity of the Tesla will be prevented from the growth of the income from autonomis and humanoid robots rather than selling cars, which has been completed.
The case, in the US District Court in the Southern of Florida District in Miami, focused on the safety of the Tesla driver’s safety.
This was the first case of the Jury Jury from a deadly accident involving autopilot. Tesla achieved at least one similar case in California in the California Court and solved several others. At least five other long been poured, according to the plaintiffs’ lawyers.
Tesla was accused of Naibel Benaibel, a college student who died on Tesla Model Sdan driven by Mr Mc He was seriously injured and seriously injured and was severely damaged and was damaged and were severely damaged and were severely damaged and was damaged and were severely damaged and injured.
Mr McGee approached T-Autopilot software tested worked when he hurled his phone and bend to search for him. The Tesla beats by more than 50 miles per hour and collided with a black SUV in formal, evidence.
Ms. Bendidis and Mr Do Stood outside.
“We had to get up and we had the courage to resist someone, especially the rich boy in the world,” said Mr. Battle outside Courthouse on Friday. “But work for Naibel.”
Mr. Mcgee told police after accident that she did not recognize or sign up or sign up.
When approaching, Mr McGee put the foot on the accelerator Pedal, overriding Autopilot work that could quit from the path.
Brett Schreiber, who represents the complainants, suspects the “Micformation” campaign of the Micforation “Campaign
“They were all aware that Autopilot was wrong,” Mr Schreber said during the controversial issues on Thursday.
Tesla lawyers blame Mr Mcgee in the accident.
Joel Smith, representing Tesla, noticed that Mr. Mcgee agreed to be distracted after casting his phone. He was a “unlimited” and “angry” who was a speedy driver, said Mr Smith.
“No vehicle can prevent” danger, Mr. Smith.
Mary Cummings, Private Technology and former Security Counselor to the National Safety Managers, prove that Autopilot had been wrong because it was failed to ensure that Mr McGee kept their eyes on the road.
Similar driving aid programs made by General Motors and Ford Motor with cameras tracking driving eyes to ensure that he looks at the road. The autopilot version in the Tesla of Mr Mcgee will continue to work as long as the driver affects occasional steering wheel, even if his eyes are on the road or not. New Tertila cars have cameras looking for drivers.
Mr. Smith, Tesla lawyer, said the company never said that his vehicles could drive without man’s oversight. Displayed Jurors quoted in a wareholder’s owner, “is the work of the drivers to stay alert, drive safely and control the car.”
Federal safety authorities knew at least 211 accidents from 2018 to 2023 including Autopilot cars involved, according to the evidence presented during the case.